|
|
Post by Dr. Anna McBreadle on Dec 31, 2008 7:29:05 GMT -10
i came across this pic whilst searching the net for new pics. as soon as i saw it, something didn't sit right with me!! it looks manipped somehow esp round the edges of DC's signature!! also round his eyes look strange!! what do you guys think?  i know some of you are good at spotting fake pics and i just can't help but think this ones been played with!! luv sam x  |
|
|
|
Post by jessica on Dec 31, 2008 7:33:59 GMT -10
Well in my humble opinion, the body doesn't fit to the head. There's no neck, which should be there in this angle.. so... I doubt it's David's body we're seeing here. They just put his head on it and I seriously doubt it's his autograph either, since the one I have looks really different to this.
Jess
|
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Anna McBreadle on Dec 31, 2008 7:44:27 GMT -10
at least im not the only one! LOL!
i also think the autograph has been manipped on as well! if you look closely at the 'D' there is a red line around it!!
luv
sam
x
|
|
|
|
Post by sanne on Dec 31, 2008 8:06:55 GMT -10
The few autographes I've seen don't look like this one. And I agree with you: head/body doesn't match. Sandra  |
|
|
|
Post by ehmalo01 on Dec 31, 2008 8:23:03 GMT -10
Myeah. I've got David's autograph and it doesn't look like this. Not really, at least. I mean, there are some similarities, but enough differences to make me wonder. Could be real, though. As for the pic itself, I have no idea, but I think it's VERY cool either way. Very classic Hollywood looking.  em |
|
|
|
Post by ohiogranny on Dec 31, 2008 10:01:49 GMT -10
I've been thinking about this for awhile and my biggest clue is the smoothness of his hair. Their are a few shots around of DC wearing a shirt with a mandarin collar and a vest. Seems like it might have originated there. I don't know if the pose is exact; will go try the gallery and see if it is there.
Karen
|
|
|
|
Post by spiff on Dec 31, 2008 10:16:45 GMT -10
to me the picture doesn't look manipulated as in that his head doesn't match his body. it does look like some work has been done to it, but i don't think there are many photos that aren't touched in photoshop at all. basically photoshop is just an extended version of the darkroom (with its filters, exposure time, etc) i think. i do agree that it is a very cool pic, must be this classic hollywood look |
|
|
|
Post by selvis07 on Dec 31, 2008 15:49:47 GMT -10
That picture was taken for GQ magazine back in the 90's and probably airbrushing and doctoring of the pictures were done.
|
|
|
|
Post by sanne on Dec 31, 2008 21:35:20 GMT -10
If that is true, Selvis07, and I have no reason to doubt you, it would mean it's an authentic DC-pic........Nice one as well, but I still think the head is a bit strange on the body  Sandra |
|
|
|
Post by Lindy on Dec 31, 2008 23:30:47 GMT -10
I don't know Sanne. But if it were ridgy-didge it looks like a screen cap. In Margarets NYPD wallpaper thread there is also a pic of JK at this angle, (well,,close anyway) It is not this particular one but I can see how it could happen mid sentence.
|
|
